I think this one works well. There is depth and relationship going on. I generally shy away from "the significant detail" (in fact I've sometimes said that the significant detail usually isn't) and here a large field of material in near, middle, and far distance is all getting organized quite nicely.
Thanks, Carl. I'm definitely into the geometric, and I do shoot a lot of details. (I too doubt that they are significant.) But I am having fun with these longer shots, trying to get geometric and distance to work at the same time. Last August I climbed to the top of every parking garage in Greenville to see what the view was like. This is one of the shots that resulted.
2 comments:
I think this one works well. There is depth and relationship going on. I generally shy away from "the significant detail" (in fact I've sometimes said that the significant detail usually isn't) and here a large field of material in near, middle, and far distance is all getting organized quite nicely.
Thanks, Carl. I'm definitely into the geometric, and I do shoot a lot of details. (I too doubt that they are significant.) But I am having fun with these longer shots, trying to get geometric and distance to work at the same time. Last August I climbed to the top of every parking garage in Greenville to see what the view was like. This is one of the shots that resulted.
Post a Comment